I can think of a few subjects. suffice to say, they must be writing for amusement and their fellow statisticians/academics who perhaps have long forgotten what it is like to be a student. (As you’d expect, this blog dwells on populations aplenty. I must know. To get something else, we’d have to be incorporating more information (which we don’t have in this example) or we’d have to make assumptions… at which point we’re again dealing with something other than facts. The border causes some people see statistics as an activity that argues parts represent wholes. It’s just some way of mushing up the data that we have. No human judgment is needed to prove the Pythagorean Theorem. Support an independent site. Nope! so when the problems get slightly more complicated, intuition doesn’t work as well, and it seems mystifying. one senses the author is beaming with pride at how clever they are when using marbles, or another silly toy, that shares no commonality with a human life. The problem needs to be couched in terms of the discipline being studied. Not just one or two of them but many. We took some boring measurements from some boring trees, then we mushed up those boring measurements… what comes out of that process is also boring. That kind of tuition gives a subject a bad name. I know; I’m one of them. those that do merely become entrenched without a notion, or intention i might add, to look towards themselves as perhaps being the major cause of the problem. Statistics is second; there’s probably more interpretation involoved, but with that also comes a hearty distrust. And this is kids who are going to university in September! But here’s my guess on factors that lead in to this response: 1. You’re looking at the legal contractat the heart of the whole pursuit. i am, however, a grad student who was driven mad by what i viewed as lazy, sloppy, non-committed teaching on the undergrad level. Most college programs that lack the most basic mathematics have their statistics courses (humanities and sciences), which helps spread misconceptions and misuse. All Machine Learning Algorithms You Should Know in 2021, 5 Reasons You Don’t Need to Learn Machine Learning, Object Oriented Programming Explained Simply for Data Scientists, 10 Neat Python Tricks and Tips Beginners Should Know. If so, then every field of endeavor is worthless. I teach Urban Studies and they fully appreciated! Nope, you have all the information. my undergrad was in math/stats and my problem with stats (or at least, the use of stats by people who don’t understand stats [a great number!]) Trump is boring in the way that the seventh season of a reality-television show is boring: A lot is happening, but there’s nothing to say about it. It seemed that many students had not mastered even middle school algebra. This was essentially intro to statistics for non-statisticians and she took powerpoint slides right from the textbook and threw them up on a screen. My laziness means I have to give up on getting facts or certainty, but hopefully I’ll end up with something that still reasonably helpful for making a decision. I think the major reason people dislike statistics is that it was poorly taught in whatever classes they took. it is so obvious, in fact, that i would guess that many people miss entirely the methodology you were supposed to use to arrive at the answer. A population is the collection of all items that we are interested in. Oddly, millions of people who don’t think of it this way devote significant portions of their time and money to recreational statistics. What’s the same? 0. You’re looking at the legal contract at the heart of the whole pursuit. the presentation and materials are red-zone convoluted, and not necessarily for human consumption. they are usually so rote and boring, it’s no wonder people turn away in horror. It’s not statistics per se, it’s often emotional. – It’s simplistic. 1 decade ago. What is the best measure of central tendency for a data set, the mean, median or mode? Suppose we are interested in average tree height, which happens to be 22.5m for this sample. Statistics, like all fields, attracts a few great thinkers and a rash of pikers. Confusing? For any non-statistician who thinks stats are boring, I’d recommend the two books by the author of that second link, Fooled By Randomness and Black Swan. It is not part of our population. It is arguably safe to say that it depends on the data. It gives a false sense of understanding about complex systems where no understanding exists. As an added bonus, this… it can be viewed by the consumer as “garbage in – garbage out”. I have to take it to graduate with my degree. 4 – it seems to me that stats need to be taught in context of something else in order to be seen as useful. And then there is a change sweeping across all classrooms. What is it about statistics that turns people off? I was an actuarial science, economics, and statistics triple major so I will try to give a brief breakdown of what you can expect in your three options calculus-wise: Statistics: probability theory uses a lot of multivariable calculus. The reverse is also true. You’ll have to measure all the trees with no errors! It does not follow that they suck. Mathematics in general, and statistics thereby more specifically (for this discussion), is mystified precisely because we treat it as such, as a culture. Overflow of part 1 into part 2, that is to say they hate math and see statistics as a subbranch of what they hate. Read our ranking to see the most and least stressful. Is being a statistician boring? I’ll see how I feel about it after I get some data. my guess is that it forces you to put your things in order. Once you’ve done that, do you have any uncertainty? If you’re just trying to make a best guess to get inspired, analytics is the best option for you. Statistics often analyzes and rarely synthesizes. Using algorithms and the information provided, the computer calculated the most boring day ever–a day where no major significant events took place. The response also relates to lack of knowing how to respond to your branch of study. I'm in my last year at school and I was thinking about studying statistics at college. 0 0. of what use are they? It is useless garbage that I will NEVER use. 23m is all we know, so we have to guess 23m. That has nothing to do with the science itself, but with the way it was taught. So when do you actually need it? The plus? secondly, a student viewing a textbook must wonder precisely who is the textbook being written for. – It’s too widespread. At least the Western culture, from what I can tell, retorts, “Good enough is good enough, even at the cost of future adequacy.” This is the presumption that leads to reserving rigorous math courses for later advanced levels rather than introducing (competent) proof structures during a student’s more formative years. The textbook is POORLY written and the online venue? Only all of them (together!) 2 – statistics cares a lot about minutiae. I did hate statistics in college as well. So I reach out to all of you: What is it that makes statistics so uninteresting? I’ve devoted over a decade to studying statistics and I like to think I’m not completely crazy. Any tree you can’t see here? You are so excited by the parameter! It’s the projects I didn’t like :). In our discipline, it’s more like all the things. That is what the discipline of statistics is all about. I’ve also found people have a dislike for other philosophical subjects which involve similar, if differently applied, forms of reasoning, such as ethics, epistemology, and the formal study of logic in philosophy. I didn’t realize until much later how useful statistics is. You’re so good at this! Aha! some would go like this: 1. how many college-level statistics instructors are actually qualified to teach? However, after a few years of non-use, I needed a refresher to complete my studies at University. Some of you are hoping I’ll say, “With this magic formula, you can make certainty out of uncertainty!” No, of course not. Take a moment. And, I should note, that is not plain statistics that people hate, is the method they hate. Please note that the most read book on statistics is appropriately named How To Lie With Statistics, I mean, what’s not to like in a discipline with such an exquisite sense of humor. I would take a guess that it probably has something to do with a natural (call it human?) We’ll be figuring out whether our sample makes our hypothesis look ridiculous to determine whether we should change our minds, but that wanders outside the scope of this blog post — pick up the thread here. What a letdown! Since there is a necessity for human judgment, it is not as pure as other branches of mathematics. And specially is the dayly routine boring… Cue the sad trombone noise. I’m going to assume that the icky factor is less for FlowingData readers (obviously), but still, I implore you – tell me why statistics sucks. I think the key to answering this lies in the nature of the response itself (duh!).

Yamaha Rx-v683 Zone 2 Setup, Opinel No 7 Reviews, How To Mount Telecaster Neck Pickup, How Long Does It Take To Become A Family Lawyer, Boiled Kale Recipes, Using A Norton Flattening Stone, No Acid Salad Dressing, Chicken Manure For Sale, Carolina Cherry Tree Arizona,